۱۳۹۵ اسفند ۱۱, چهارشنبه

The Iran Regime's Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) Blacklisting Is a Long Overdue Measure













Why Iran’s Revolutionary Guards deserve to be blacklisted
The discussion in the White House to designate Iran’s Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) as a foreign terrorist organization remains very much alive.
The US Congress has also witnessed many different plans weighed in this regard. Iran and its lobbies, on the other hand, terrified of the consequences, have taken to the media to depict an image of the US suffering from such a move. Wrote Heshmat Alavi on ‘Al-Arabiya’ on February 28, 2017
Consequences for Iran
The political, economic, social and military consequences of the IRGC’s terrorist designation are quite significant, to say the least. There are two paths to realize such an objective. President Donald Trump can issue an executive order, which can be cancelled through an executive order.
Congress can also pass a bill to engrave such a decision law of the land in America.
With a new administration in Washington, both paths are quite active and probable, especially through Congress that is already evaluating a variety of bills in this regard.
If the IRGC is blacklisted, this very important entity for the Iranian regime will be placed under the following restrictions according to US laws:
- All IRGC assets in the US will be subject to confiscation
- No US citizen of company, or sister company, are authorized to engage in goods or service transactions with the IRGC
- US banks are banned from financial transactions with the IRGC
- The US can confiscate or inspect ships and boats belonging to the IRGC in international waters
Political consequences
The IRGC is considered the main pillar of the mullahs’ regime, in charge of pursuing Tehran’s policy of domestic crackdown and exporting terrorism abroad. Blacklisting the IRGC would inflict a major blow to the Iranian regime in its entirety. This will weaken not only Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei but the regime as a whole, as the IRGC is the force ensuring the security of mullahs’ apparatus in its entirety.
Economic damages
The IRGC is a large economic powerhouse. There are no exact statistics of the budget or revenue the IRGC enjoys through its economic activities. There is no doubt, however, that the IRGC, along with its long slate of entities and affiliated organizations, has an in-depth presence in all aspects of Iran’s life. This includes the oil and gas industry, communications, major construction projects, transportation, power projects and imports.
Experts estimate the IRGC is in control of around 20 to 40 percent of Iran’s economy. The IRGC runs 812 companies registered inside the country and abroad, all literally under the sultanate of this military empire. Any foreign individual or company intending to invest in Iran must enter cooperation with at least one of the 812 above mentioned companies.
Currently, the IRGC is involved in 1,700 government contracts, while there are claims of the number ranging at around 2,000. These contracts have transformed the IRGC into the largest economic force not only in Iran, but across the Middle East. Some of these contracts are valued into the billions. Reuters reported the IRGC empire has an annual sale of $10 to $12 billion.
New sanctions to follow
In the scenario of an IRGC blacklisting, new sanctions will most definitely be a high probability. In such a case, there will be grave negative impacts to come for Tehran.
1. Foreign investors will literally flee from Iran. Projects in need of investment in Iran’s oil and gas sector will be either difficult or quite impossible. All companies that signed contracts following the deal aimed at curbing Iran’s nuclear program will have to reevaluate their future interests. One such example was France’s oil giant Total announcing final decisions on any deals with Iran will wait until the summer to allow the new US President clarify his position on the Iran nuclear deal. This has endangered Total’s contract with Iran on developing phase 11 of the mammoth South Pars gas field.
2. Iran’s return to global banking and financial system will become very difficult. The banks of various countries will hesitate to sign deals with Iran considering probable US sanctions and other punitive measures.
3. Export of goods to Iran will turn out extremely problematic, considering the IRGC’s deep involvement in numerous aspects of the country’s economics.
Flights suspended
While Iran boasts deals with Airbus and Boeing to supposedly inject new life into to its economy, the new White House has raised concerns amongst foreign companies.
“Air India Express… has put on hold a plan to fly to Tehran amid renewed tensions between the US and Iran…Since some of Air India Ltd.’s plane purchases were funded by the Export-Import Bank of the United States, it won’t be able to fly to places where the US government imposes sanctions, K. Shyamsundar,” according to Bloomberg citing the airline’s chief executive officer.
Military consequences
This may be considered the most important aspect for Iran. Why?
“…the major export of Iran is actually malign influence across the region,” said US Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Joseph Dunford said recently. “You’ve got a very aggressive proxy war; we’ve seen that in Yemen. We see their influence in Syria. We see their malign influence in Lebanon, as well as in Iraq and the rest of the region.”
However, blacklisting the IRGC will lead to the following, to say the least:
1. Iran’s presence in Syria, Iraq, Yemen and other countries will become illegitimate and provide legitimacy for the international community to evict the IRGC from all foreign countries.
2.The IRGC and its affiliated proxy militia must pull out of Syria, Iraq, and … or face the consequences of such a blacklisting.
3. Pressure on the IRGC in Syria will define into Bashar Assad and the Lebanese Hezbollah losing their support in Syria and Lebanon. The Houthis in Yemen and the Popular Mobilization Units in Iraq will face similar fates.
4. This will spell an end to the IRGC’s adventures in international waters, as its boats and ships can be confiscated and even attacked.
5. The IRGC terrorist designation will severely alter the region’s military balance, most likely ending Iran’s reach to various countries.
The main benefactor in such a scenario are Middle East nations who have suffered from IRGC-sponsored terrorism and their Quds Force elements for decades. This includes Syria, Iraq, Bahrain, Yemen, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia.
In this Sept. 21, 2016 file photo, an Emad long-range ballistic surface-to-surface missile is displayed by the IRGC during a military parade, in front of the shrine of Ayatollah Khomeini, just outside Tehran. (AP)
Social consequences
The IRGC has been the main element behind oppressing social rallies and protests. The 2009 uprising was quelled only after the IRGC was dispatched into the city streets. A terrorist designation for the IRGC will inflict a severe blow to its members’ spirits in the face of popular demonstrations.
It is also an undeniable reality that a blacklisted IRGC will suffer major crises, a decrease in ranks and files, and lead to a loss of spirit. The defensive lines established in Damascus, Baghdad, Beirut and Sana’a must be transferred back to cities inside the country.
The Iranian people will most likely react to such a defeat for the IRGC and regain their readiness to pour into the streets whenever possible. The Iranian regime has enjoyed foreign support and the West’s highly flawed appeasement policy, allowing it rule with an iron fist and through atrocious human rights violations.
The IRGC’s terrorist designation will be considered the last nail in the coffin for the appeasement policy and foreign support.
Fight against ISIS
The IRGC and affiliated militias playing any positive role in the fight against ISIS is nothing but a hoax and major deception. There is no doubt that ISIS is the offspring of the atrocious oppression of the nations of Iraq and Syria by the mullahs’ regime with the support of Bashar Assad and former Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Maliki.
In an interview with Fox News in November 2014 then US Secretary of State John Kerry revealed how Assad facilitated the release of 1,500 prisoners, parallel to 1,000 by Maliki in Iraq, leading to the foundation of ISIS.
The positions and policies adopted by Maliki against Iraq’s Sunni community paved the path for the rise and growth of ISIS, according to former US ambassador to Iraq James Jeffrey. The Americans knew what Maliki was up to yet chose to take no action, Jeffrey added.
The Iraqi Parliament Research Committee specifically found Maliki responsible for ordering the evacuation of Mosul and leaving the city to ISIS.
Assad repeated a similar tactic in Syria, with the city of Palmyra being one very specific example. It seems as if everyone knows their role in exchanging Syria’s cities with each other. This leaves the West terrified and allows ISIS to launch attacks against Syrian opposition forces.
Iran has never sought the destruction of ISIS, as such an element provides the necessary pretext to continue its meddling and military presence in both Iraq and Syria.
One very interesting argument repeated by many government officials, senators and political/military experts, and repeated by many Arab leaders, is the indisputable fact that Daesh has launched terrorist attacks and killings in all countries, with the exception of Iran. This speaks of a specific cooperation, collaboration and/or unwritten agreement, to say the least.
Will Iran retaliate?
We cannot fundamentally cancel such a scenario. However, a defeated force will no longer be on the defensive and is forced to be on the defensive, especially on domestic issues.
The mullahs and the IRGC very well understand firm language. The Trump administration issued two warnings after the January 29th missile launch and Iran quickly cancelled a second ballistic missile test scheduled for February 3rd.
The IRGC blacklisting is a long overdue measure and Iran has been able to effectively take advantage of such a devastating hesitation seen in the West. The time has come to bring an end to such a drastic mistake and deliver the one message Iran will most definitely take very seriously, and truly crippling the mullahs in favor of the Iranian people’s ultimate interests.
To this end, the only party suffering from an IRGC terrorist designation will be the mullahs in Tehran.

Iran: The Clash of Rival Factions Over Regimes Next President




NCRI - One day after Rouhani's announcement for candidacy in the upcoming presidential election, the former First Vice President of Iran, Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei stated that Rouhani should not be elected again. He also warned that two different and dangerous poles will be formed if Mohammad Baghaei is disqualified.
Meanwhile, following Eshagh Jahangiri's meeting with Khamenei, the political figure Karimi Ghodoosi affiliated with Khamenei stated in the Iranian parliament that Khamenei has called Mohammad Khatami as a troublemaker and a person who did not befriend Rafsanjani for years."
Karimi Ghodoosi added:"having visited the Supreme Leader, Mr. Jahangiri made a request to Khamenei in order to appoint a new mediator to connect political circles and also to arrange the meetings with Khamenei since Hashemi Rafsanjani who had the same role has died. Following this request, Khamenei said that this issue is a total misinterpretation and Hashemi was not a mediator."
The head of the Judiciary, Sadegh Larijani warned Rouhani for using foriegn media to campaign and stated: “we should not forget that the enemies of the Islamic Republic tactfully impact on the public opinion as well as the decisions made by the executives and observers. Definitely, those criminals who intend to use anti-revolutionary factors in order to influence the election procedures are very dangerous. We sometimes witness their marks on our society."

Human Rights NGOs Joint Statement on Iran 1988 Massacre









Six human rights organisations with consultative status to the United Nations human rights body have submitted a joint written statement to the current session of the Human Rights Council about the 1988 massacre of political prisoners in Iran and the need for the international community to hold the perpetrators to account.
In the summer of 1988, the Iranian regime summarily and extra-judicially executed tens of thousands of political prisoners held in jails across Iran. The vast majority of the victims were activists of the opposition the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI) or (MEK).
The massacre was carried out on the basis of a fatwa by the regime’s then-Supreme Leader Ruhollah Khomeini.
The joint written statement is titled: “The 1988 massacre of political prisoners in Iran constitutes a crime against humanity”.
Click here to read the Joint written statement submitted by the Nonviolent Radical Party, Transnational and Transparty, a non-governmental organization in general consultative status, Women’s Human Rights International Association, Edmund Rice International Limited, France Libertes : Fondation Danielle Mitterrand, non-governmental organizations in special consultative status, International Educational Development, Inc., Mouvement contre le racisme et pour l’amitié entre les peuples, non-governmental organizations on the roster.
The text of the joint written statement:
The 1988 massacre of political prisoners in Iran constitutes a crime against humanity* 

On November 27, 2016 a Special Clerical Court in the Iranian city of Qom sentenced Ahmad Montazeri, son of the late Grand Ayatollah Hossein-Ali Montazeri, to 21 years imprisonment and to be stripped of any clerical authority for releasing a tape that captures his father denouncing the 1988 massacre of political prisoners in the Islamic Republic of Iran.

On August 9, 2016 a confidential audio file of a meeting held on August 15, 1988 between Ayatollah Montazeri, former heir to Ayatollah Khomeini, and members of the Judiciary and Intelligence Ministry of Iran, became public after 28 years showing new details of the largest wave of political executions in the world since World War II. In the audio file the perpetrators of the 1988 massacre confirm the executions in their own voices. The mass executions of political prisoners in Iran began in 1981.

After the Iran-Iraq ceasefire in July 1988, Ayatollah Khomeini issued a fatwa (decree) stating:
“As the treacherous Monafeqin (PMOI) do not believe in Islam and what they say is out of deception and hypocrisy, and as their leaders have admitted that they have become renegades, and as they are waging war on God, … it is decreed that those who are in prisons throughout the country and remain steadfast in their support for the Monafeqin (PMOI), are waging war on God and are condemned to execution. In Tehran, Mr. HojatolIslam Nayyeri, Sharia judge, and Mr. Eshraqi (Tehran’s prosecutor) and a representative of the Intelligence Ministry will decide on the fate with a majority vote. In prisons located in provincial capitals the Sharia judge, revolutionary prosecutor, and member of the intelligence ministry will be making the ruling. Those responsible for the rulings should not be hesitant or doubtful and should be most ferocious in the face of infidels”.
When asked by the Head of the Judiciary if this fatwa should apply to those who have already received their prison sentences, Ayatollah Khomeini stated:

“In all the above cases, if the person at any stage or at any time maintains their support for the hypocrites (PMOI), the sentence is execution. Annihilate the enemies of Islam immediately. As regards to the cases, use whichever criterion that speeds up the implementation of the verdict.”

Based on Khomeini’s fatwa, committees, dubbed “Death Commissions” by prisoners, were created. Many of those executed in this wave of executions were prisoners who had been sentenced by the revolutionary courts to several years of imprisonment and were serving their sentences. Some had already completed their sentences, but had not been released or had been groundlessly imprisoned. Others had been released but were re-arrested and executed during the massacre.

In the audio file, Ayatollah Montazeri is heard addressing the death commission. Those present include Mostafa PourMohammadi, representative of the Intelligence Ministry; Hossein-Ali Nayyeri, the religious judge; Morteza Eshraqi, Tehran Prosecutor; and Ebrahim Raissi, Deputy Tehran Prosecutor. Pour-Mohammadi is currently Iran’s Justice Minister, Nayyeri is the head of the Supreme Disciplinary Court for Judges, and Raissi is a member of the Assembly of Experts and the head of the Astan Qods-e Razavi foundation, one of the most important state-affiliated political and economic powerhouses in Iran. He is also a candidate to succeed Khamenei. The following points were made in this meeting:

Montazeri:

“In other cities, they committed all sorts of things (crimes) … and in Ahwaz it was really horrendous. This judge, that judge, in this city, in that city, they condemned someone to 5 years, 6 years, 10 years, 15 years. Now executing these people while there have been no new activities (by the prisoner) means that the entire judicial system has been at fault.”
Addressing Pour-Mohammadi, the representative of the Intelligence Ministry, Montazeri said:

“Intelligence had control on the (killings) and had invested in it. Ahmad Khomeini (Khomeini’s son) has personally been saying for 3-4 years that the PMOI affiliates should all be executed, even if they only read their newspaper, publications or statements.”

Montazeri:

“15-year-old girls and pregnant women were among those killed. In Shiite jurisprudence even if a woman is ‘Mohareb’ (waging war on God) she shouldn’t be executed, I told Khomeini this but he said no, execute the women too.”

In some prisons, including Kermanshah’s Dizel-Abad Prison, Mashad’s Vakil-Abad Prison, Gachsaran Prison, Khorramabad Prison, Kerman Prison, and Masjed-Soleyman Prison, not a single political prisoner was spared. In other prisons practically all those affiliated with the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK) were executed. In one of the wards for women in Gohardasht (Rajai-Shahr) Prison in Karaj, only four out of 200 prisoners survived.

In a letter to Khomeini, dated July 31, 1988, Montazeri protested against the mass executions and unveiled “the death of several thousand people in a few days.” In another letter, Montazeri referred to the killings as a “massacre” and wrote that the PMOI represent an ‘ideology’ and a ‘school of thought’ which cannot be eliminated with executions.

Soon after the start of the massacre of the Mojahedin, prisoners affiliated with other political groups were also executed.

“Death Commission” Procedures

According to numerous reports the procedure of the death commissions was very simple. The first question was: ‘What is your political affiliation?’ Those who answered ‘Mojahedin’ were sent to the gallows. The ‘correct’ answer was ‘Monafeqin’ (hypocrites, the derogatory term used by Iranian authorities to describe the PMOI). According to Montazeri in some cities this response wasn’t enough and prisoners were tested to see if they would be willing to execute other PMOI members or give televised interviews condemning the group. A negative response meant execution.

Mass graves

Those executed in Tehran and other cities were buried in mass graves. Iran's rulers have tried to wipe out all traces of the mass graves. At the end of 2008 and in early 2009, bulldozers flattened the site of mass graves in Khavaran Cemetery in east Tehran. In a statement on January 20, 2009, Amnesty International insisted these graveyards must be kept intact for investigations.

The UN Commission on Human Rights’ Rapporteur on arbitrary executions stated in his 1989 report, “In the days of 14, 15 and 16th of August 1988, 860 bodies were transferred from Evin Prison [Tehran] to the Behesht-e Zahra Cemetery.” This is despite the fact that the majority of the dead were buried in mass graves in Khavaran Cemetery.

Reza Malek, a former senior Intelligence Ministry official who became a whistle-blower and spent 12 years in prison, secretly sent a video clip to Ban Ki-moon from within prison revealing that 33,700 people were executed during the 1988 massacre.

Dr. Mohammad Maleki, the first chancellor of Tehran University after the 1979 revolution and a prominent dissident in Iran, pointed out in an interview with Dorr TV on August 14, 2016 that Reza Malek, who dealt with documents and archives at the Intelligence Ministry, has stated that more than 30,400 of the executed prisoners were from the PMOI, and 2000-3000 were leftist and Marxists.

In a recent article about Rwanda, Mohammad Nourizad, a close associate to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei before the 2009 suppression of the uprising in Tehran, writes:
“Here, in a matter of 2 or 3 months, 33,000 men, women, young and old were imprisoned, tortured and executed. Their bodies were taken to Khavaran Cemetery and barren lands by trucks and buried in mass graves, happy of what they had done…”

Independent Reports

British Barrister Geoffrey Robertson, QC, head of the UN Special Court for Sierra Leone, published an in-depth, documented report about the massacre in 2010 despite not having access to all the evidence. In his book entitled, “Mullahs without Mercy” he states these killings are crimes against humanity and can be classified as genocide. Robertson concludes that the international community’s inaction and insensitivity to this crime allowed the Iranian government to feel free to continue violating international law and human rights. He concludes:

“In Iran the prison massacres, by virtue of their calculated cruelty designed by the political and judicial leaders of the state, are more reprehensible than their comparators… The two leaders who advised and implemented the 1988 massacres, Khamenei and Rafsanjani are respectively Supreme Leader and Expediency Council head, and the Death Committee judges remain in judicial place. They deserve to be put on trial at an international court, of the kind that can only be established by the Security Council.” (Page 104)

The General Assembly adopted Resolution A/RES/71/204 on December 19, 2016 which called upon Iran to "launch a comprehensive accountability process in response to all cases of serious human rights violations, including those involving the Iranian judiciary and security agencies, and … to end impunity for such violations". Iran, however, has failed to comply with this call.

What happened in Iranian prisons in 1988 remains a deep scar on the body and soul of the Iranian people. The only way to soothe this wound would be a comprehensive investigation and identifying those who abused their power to execute thousands of their ideological opponents.

On November 2, 2007, to mark the anniversary of this massacre, Amnesty International released a statement and referred to this day as a “massacre of the prisoners”. It added: “Amnesty International believes this has been a crime against humanity.” In the December 25, 2005 report of Human Rights Watch, these killings are also referred to as
“crimes against humanity.”

On September 20, 2013, the International Federation of Human Rights (FIDH) qualified the events of 1988 as extrajudicial and arbitrary executions and crimes against humanity.

Since the summer of 2016, many family members of victims of the 1988 massacre in Iran have publicly spoken out and demanded justice for their loved ones.

On November 3, 2016, Amnesty International issued an Urgent Action stating that prisoner of conscience Maryam
Akbari-Monfared, who is serving a 15-year sentence in Tehran’s Evin Prison, is being denied access to medical treatment and is facing reprisals after filing a formal complaint that seeks an official investigation into the 1988 mass killings of political prisoners, including her siblings.

'Justice for Victims of 1988 Massacre in Iran (JVMI)', a London-based association of families of the victims of the massacre, former political prisoners, international human rights lawyers and former UN and government officials, has led a campaign to seek the truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence.

According to international conventions there is no statute of limitations for crimes against humanity. It is the responsibility of the international community, including the Human Rights Council and the Security Council, to attend to this matter and to ensure that accountability is achieved. What gives this matter urgency is that the massacre and genocide of 1988 has not come to an end and still continues – for example, High Commissioner Zeid Ra'ad Al Hussein issued a statement deploring “mass executions” in Iran following the execution of 25 Sunnis on August 2, 2016. Additionally the perpetrators of the 1988 massacre still hold key positions and continue to murder their opponents.
Recommendations

In conclusion we recommend:

1) the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and the UN Human Rights Council place the massacre on their agenda and as a first step appoint an international commission to investigate this atrocious crime;
2) the Special Rapporteur on the human rights situation in Iran, Asma Jahangir, carry out an inquiry into the 1988 massacre as part of her mandate;
3) the Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, Pablo de Greiff, carry out an inquiry into the 1988 massacre as part of his mandate.
--------------------------
*HANDS OFF CAIN, Comité de soutien au droits de l'homme en Iran, Association des Femmes Iraniennes en France, NGO without consultative status, also share the views expressed in this statement.

FATF Remains Concerned With Terrorist Financing From Iran






The intergovernmental Financial Action Task Force (FATF), which monitors money laundering and terrorism financing worldwide, decided in late June to keep Iran on its blacklist of high-risk countries,
Iran under the rule of mullahs is still considered a Non-Cooperative Country or Territory.
The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) is the global standard setting body for anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT).
In order to protect the international financial system from money laundering and financing of terrorism (ML/FT) risks and to encourage greater compliance with the AML/CFT standards, the FATF identified jurisdictions that have strategic deficiencies and works with them to address those deficiencies that pose a risk to the international financial system.
Being on the Non-Cooperative Country or Territory (NCCT) list means Iran regime is only able to engage in business transactions with a limited number of small banks in few countries that "demand exorbitant costs to cover their risks, which will directly impact exports and imports".

A public statement published on 24 February 2017 on the FATF website stated: “In June 2016, the FATF welcomed Iran’s adoption of, and high-level political commitment to, an Action Plan to address its strategic AML/CFT deficiencies, and its decision to seek technical assistance in the implementation of the Action Plan. Accordingly, in June 2016, the FATF suspended counter-measures for twelve months in order to monitor Iran’s progress in implementing the Action Plan. If the FATF determines that Iran has not demonstrated sufficient progress in implementing the Action Plan at the end of that period, FATF’s call for counter-measures will be re-imposed. If Iran meets its commitments under the Action Plan in that time period, the FATF will consider next steps in this regard.”
“Iran will remain on the FATF Public Statement until the full Action Plan has been completed. Until Iran implements the measures required to address the deficiencies identified in the Action Plan, the FATF will remain concerned with the terrorist financing risk emanating from Iran and the threat this poses to the international financial system.”
“The FATF, therefore, calls on its members and urges all jurisdictions to continue to advise their financial institutions to apply enhanced due diligence to business relationships and transactions with natural and legal persons from Iran, consistent with FATF Recommendation 19. The FATF urges Iran to fully address its AML/CFT deficiencies, in particular those related to terrorist financing.”

Iran: The IRGC Must Be Evicted From Syria, Iraq, Yemen and Other Countries of the Region






Failure to aid province highlights Iran's misguided priorities
For days now, large swathes of western Iran have been covered in dust — literally. Dust storms have overwhelmed the oil-rich province of Khuzestan. Air quality is reportedly some 30 to 60 times the healthy level. Power stations have broken down; banks, schools and offices were closed; water supplies were disrupted; and flights to and from Ahvaz were cancelled — including, ironically, one scheduled for the regime’s top “environment” official. Wrote Ali Safavi in ‘The Hill’ on February 28, 2017.
Wipe the dust off of Iran’s scenic Khuzestan province, and you’ll see an even uglier truth. What is happening in Khuzestan exemplifies the disastrous policies implemented by Tehran’s fundamentalist rulers. While it spends billions to wage sectarian conflicts in Syria, Yemen and Iraq, the Iranian regime has systematically and unabashedly neglected the country’s ecosystem and economy for the past 40 years.
That is why thousands of people in southwestern Iran, including the capital city of Ahvaz, rose up earlier this month in protest. Chanting “death to tyranny” and “Ahvaz is our city, clean air is our right,” the people exposed their rulers' ultimate vulnerability — overwhelming domestic opposition.
For years, Washington has viewed Tehran as the world’s worst state-sponsor of terror while, by some twisted logic, trying to placate the mullahs. The West, in general, has never taken into account how the ruled view their rulers. The Iranian people are grappling with unprecedented, devastating challenges caused by the ruling regime’s policies.
Ahvaz, for example, has been described as the world’s most polluted city by the World Health Organization. Khuzestan lies in the Fertile Crescent, with more than one million hectares of agricultural land. Destructive policies, such as the unbridled construction of dams (producing enormous wealth for the select few), have caused rivers to dry up, and the climate has taken a turn for the worse.
For decades, industrial waste and sewage poured into the Karun, Iran’s largest navigable river, without the slightest state interference. Khuzestan is reeling from unprecedented unemployment, a recession, a housing crisis and lack of access to education.
Add a lack of basic civic services to the environmental mishandling, and the systematic failure of public services, including water and electricity, and you get thousands of people pouring into the streets to protest.
It is clear those responsible for bringing on this enormous scale of ruin and tragedy will not be willing or able to offer genuine remedies. This is a regime, after all, that puts greater emphasis on Syria than its own provinces.
In 2013, a former commander of intelligence for the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) proclaimed: “Syria is our 35th province, and is a strategic province for us. If the enemy attacks us and seeks to take Syria or Khuzestan, our priority would be to keep Syria, because if we keep Syria, we can take back Khuzestan at a later date. But if we lose Syria, we would lose the capital Tehran.”
It is no wonder that the Iranian people, choking on dust and without jobs, despise the IRGC and everything for which it stands. It should be equally self-evident for the U.S. administration that the IRGC is a terrorist entity, and should be so designated. The IRGC must be evicted from Syria, Iraq, Yemen and other countries of the region before any resolution to the regional crises can be found.
For years, some in Washington naively hoped that elusive “moderates” within the regime would solve everything. But even after the nuclear deal signed in the summer of 2015, the Iranian regime has been neither able nor willing to resolve the Iranian people’s multitude of problems and real-life crises. Now, with the death of their most notable “moderate” figure, Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, the chances are more remote than ever before.
Last week, the so-called "moderate" president Hassan Rouhani visited Khuzestan and unashamedly tried to deflect blame from the regime by saying that the catastrophic situation in the province is the result of "divine punishment" for the residents' inability to promote righteousness and to protect the environment.
So, instead of pinning its strategy on self-delusion, Washington now has the opportunity to find a real partner in the Iranian people and their organized opposition. For the sake of American security, policymakers need to decouple Washington’s future from Tehran’s failing Islamic extremists and, instead, reach out to the people of Iran who want change, democracy, and a better life.
The regime’s next presidential elections are scheduled to take place in May. In 2009, millions of protesters poured into the streets after those same elections, but, unfortunately, the Obama administration stood silent. The resentment of the population is now even deeper than it was eight years ago. The current administration should not repeat the same mistake.
Washington should adopt a firm policy against the Iranian regime and its terrorist and repressive arm, the IRGC, while vociferously standing with those who seek genuine democratic change. This time, we shouldn’t stand idly by and let the dust settle in Iran.

۱۵۴ سناتور و نماینده مجلس فرانسه خواستار شناسایی رسمی کشور فلسطین شدند




۱۵۴ سناتور و نماینده مجلس فرانسه خواستار شناسایی رسمی کشور فلسطین شدند


۱۵۴تن از سناتورها و نمایندگان پارلمان فرانسه از حزب #سوسیالیست، طی نامه‌یی خطاب به فرانسوا اولاند رئیس‌جمهور، خواهان آن شدند که فرانسه کشور فلسطین را به‌رسمیت بشناسد.

منتخبان فرانسوی در این نامه که در مجله ژورنال دودیمانش منتشر شده تأکید کرده‌اند که زمان آن است که مذاکرات در شرایط برابر و به‌صورت کشور با کشور صورت گیرد… رئیس‌جمهور فرانسه باید با استفاده از این فرصت تاریخی، کشور فلسطین را به‌رسمیت بشناسد.

محسن رضایی : اعترا ف‌‌‌ به کشور گشأیی ، اعترا ف‌‌‌ به دزدی و فساد عمیق و وحشت از فروپاشی نظام



محسن رضایی : اعترا ف‌‌‌ به کشور گشأیی ، اعترا ف‌‌‌ به دزدی و فساد عمیق و وحشت از فروپاشی نظام
محسن رضایی، فرماندۀ پیشین سپاه پاسداران، اعتراف کرده است که فساد و ناکارآمدی همچون بمب عمل می کنند و اگر با آنها مقابلۀ جدی نشود نظام اسلامی را از درون فرومی پاشانند. دبیر مجمع تشخیص مصلحت نظام که این سخن را در شهرستان لنجان ایراد نمود، با اشاره به فروپاشی سلسله های صفویه و قاجار و همچنین حضور نظامی جمهوری اسلامی ایران در نبردهای جاری منطقه، خطاب به مسئولان کشور گفت : “باید ضمن آن که به گسترش حوزۀ نفوذ خود اهمیت می دهیم، مراقب درون هم باشیم.”
او تصریح کرد : “ممکن است حکومتی در بیرون وجه قدرتمندی داشته باشد، اما در درون در حال فروپاشی باشد.” به گفتۀ محسن رضایی “ایران در دوران صفویه پیشرفت داشت ولی در اواخر آن، از درون رو به فروپاشی گذاشته بود.”
رضایی در ادامۀ این سخن افزود : “در داخل ایران، ناکارآمدی، فساد و انحرافات مانند بمب عمل می کنند و اگر با این آسیب ها مبارزه نکنیم از داخل تهی می شویم.” دبیر مجمع تشخیص مصلحت نظام با اشاره به برخی مشکلات و آسیب های امروز جامعۀ ایران از جمله بحران زیست محیطی در خوزستان و خشکیدن دریاچه های کشور، گفت : “همگی این ها ناشی از ناکارآمدی است.”
دبیر مجمع تشخیص مصلحت نظام “فساد را خطر دومی” دانست که نظام اسلامی ایران را امروز از درون تهدید می کند. او مدعی شد که مقابله با ناکارآمدی و فساد در کشور نیازمند ستیز با غرب یا به قول او مبارزه با “غربزدگی” و اعمال “انضباط انقلابی” یا به ادعای وی بازگشت به “ارزش های انقلاب اسلامی” اس
ت

تشدید جنگ قدرت در رژیم از ویژگیهای مرحله سرنگونی







تشدید جنگ قدرت در رژیم از ویژگیهای مرحله سرنگونی
در هر ۳روز شنبه و یکشنبه و دوشنبه این هفته (7 و ۸ و ۹ اسفند) روحانی پیاپی سخنرانی کرد که مضمون اصلی هر ۳سخنرانی، حمله به باند ولی‌فقیه، به‌خصوص شخص خامنه‌ای بود؛ آن‌چنان‌که یکی از رسانه‌های باند خامنه‌ای نوشت: «3بار کنایه و تقابل‌جویی با رهبری در دو سخنرانی متوالی، این سؤال را پیش خواهد آورد که آیا این رویه به‌صورت اتفاقی پیش آمده؟!... حداقل التزام عملی به ولایت فقیه چقدر است؟!.[1]
ببینیم روحانی در سخنرانیهای اخیر خود چه گفته که این رسانه حکومتی علناً و صراحتاً آن را «کنایه و تقابل‌جویی» با خامنه‌ای توصیف کرده و روحانی را به عدم «التزام عملی به ولایت‌فقیه»، که اتهام سنگینی در نظام ولایت‌فقیه محسوب می‌شود، متهم کرده است.
روحانی روز شنبه طی سخنرانی در همایش مجریان انتخابات گفت: «هیچ کشوری نبوده که او را به فصل7 منشور سازمان ملل بکشانند و قطعنامه فصل هفتی علیه او تصویب کنند، مگر آن‌که یا آن نظام را سرنگون کرده‌اند یا جنگ را بر آن تحمیل کرده‌اند[2]
رسانه‌های باند ولی‌فقیه این حرف روحانی را در کنار حرف چندی پیش خامنه‌ای گذاشتند که گفته بود: «این که می‌گویند ”اگر برجام نبود وقوع جنگ حتمی بود“این حرف یک دروغ محض است[3]
خامنه‌ای همچنین طی اظهاراتی از این‌که روحانی گناه وضع آشفته کنونی را میراث دولت احمدی‌نژاد می‌داند، اظهار ناراحتی کرده و گفته بود: «این حرف که وضع فعلی نتیجه گذشتگان است… مشکلی را حل نمی‌کند… چند صباح دیگر نیز دیگران همین قضاوت را درباره ما خواهند کرد که چرا برای علاج مشکل مردم کاری انجام نشد».[4] اما روحانی با لحنی تند و مهاجم، گفت: «اگر از آن زمان بگویی، به‌ ما می‌گویند چرا به قبل از این دولت رفته‌اید و چه‌کار دارید به قبل از این دولت؟!»
البته جاهایی هم روحانی در دفاع از خود در برابر حملات دلواپسان از «هدایت و رهبری» و «ارشادات و توصیه‌های» مقام معظم رهبری حرف می‌زند و تلاش می‌کند پشت خامنه‌ای قایم شود و بگوید برجام، هر چه که بود یا هر چه که هست، زیر نظر خامنه‌ای صورت گرفته است.
رویارویی، بین خامنه‌ای و روحانی، به پایین‌تر هم سرایت کرده است. از جمله در جلسه علنی روز یکشنبه 8اسفند، برخی اعضای مجلس در برابر دستور خامنه‌ای مبنی بر برداشت از صندوق توسعه، زبان به اعتراض گشودند و یکی از اعضای مجلس به نام صادقی گفت: «ما ابتدا که نماینده شدیم فکر می‌کردیم فاعل به‌اختیاریم، ولی در انتهای نمایندگی فهمیدیم مفعول بالاضطرار هستیم» و عضو دیگر مجلس به نام دهقان گفت: «نوع انتقال مطلب از مقام معظم رهبری خدایی نکرده ممکن است که موجب کاستن جایگاه معنوی ولایت بشود».
به‌هر حال، نیازی به‌ذکر همه «کنایه (ها) و تقابل‌جویی» های باند روحانی علیه خامنه‌ای نیست؛ همین چند نمونه کافی است که ببینیم جنگ قدرت درون رژیم آخوندی وارد مرحله‌یی شده است که بسیاری از مرز سرخهای درون رژیم ولایت فقیه را به شکل مهار ناپذیری در می‌نوردد. چرا چنین است؟
خامنه‌ای در شرایط کنونی که با شکست تمام سیاستهای اصلی خود روبه‌رو شده توان حل و فصل جنگ قدرت درونی رژیم و حتی یک سویه کردن آن را به سود یک جناح از دست داده است. شکست برجام برخلاف آن چه باند خامنه‌ای تلاش می‌کند وانمود کند، بیش از هر چیز شکست شخص خامنه‌ای است. شکست سیاستهای تجاوزگرانه و تروریستی رژیم در منطقه از سوریه گرفته تا عراق و یمن مشخصاً شکست شخص خامنه‌ای محسوب می‌شوند. مطالبات اقتصادی و اجتماعی انباشته شده و پاسخ نایافته گوناگون از وضعیت فاجعه‌بار محیط‌زیست که مردم به‌جان‌آمده‌ خوزستان را در اعتراض به خیابان کشانده تا فشار معیشتی خردکننده بر کارگران، فرهنگیان یا غارت شدگانی که این روزها حقوق خود را در تجمعات هزاران نفره در برابر مجلس ارتجاع یا سایر مراکز حکومتی فریاد می‌زنند؛ همه و همه قبل از آن که فلج این یا آن دولت دست‌نشانده در رژیم آخوندی را نشان دهد (آن‌چنان که هر دو باند رژیم تلاش می‌کنند وانمود کنند) نشان‌دهنده ناتوانی شخص ولی‌فقیه و تمامیت نظام منفور او در پاسخگویی به ابتدایی‌ترین خواسته‌های برحق معیشتی مردم ایران است.
در چنین شرایطی است که ضعف و طلسم‌شکستگی خامنه‌ای بیش از پیش بارز شده است و او را در مهار شقه درونی رژیم ناتوان تر و دست باندهای رژیم که حیات تمامیت این نظام را در صورت ادامه چنین روندی بر باد می‌بییند برای حمله به شخص خامنه‌ای بازتر کرده است.



[1] سایت حکومتی رجا نیوز- 8اسفند
[2] تلویزیون رژیم ـ 7اسفند
[3] سخنرانی خامنه‌ای در دیدار با گروهی از مردم آذربایجان ـ 27بهمن 95
[4] سخنان خامنه‌ای در درس خارج ـ سایت خامنه‌ای ـ 2اسفند 95.

Iran: Un idéologue des pasdaran évoque les plans terroristes du régime iranien (vidéo)






Iran: Un idéologue des pasdaran évoque les plans terroristes du régime iranien (vidéo)


Un vidéoclip nouvellement posté sur les sites du régime iranien montre un idéologue des pasdaran appelé Hassan Abbasi, menaçant de déclencher des cellules terroristes aux États-Unis, ciblant les installations de lancement de missiles nucléaires. Le journaliste Patrick Goodenough a réalisé le reportage suivant pour « CNC News », le 28 février 2017 :
Au moment où l'administration Trump étudie la possibilité de lister les pasdaran comme une organisation terroriste étrangère, le ministre iranien des Affaires étrangères, Javad Zarif, a déclaré ce week-end que les efforts des États-Unis pour sanctionner l'organisation ne leur ont jamais profité.
Zarif a déclaré que le monde entier reconnaît que « les pasdaran ont accordé le plus grand soutien aux pays voisins dans leur lutte contre le terrorisme ! »
L'Iran soutient les milices chiites qui combattent aux côtés de l'armée irakienne contre les djihadistes islamiques d'Irak et de Syrie (DAECH / Etat islamique). Les pasdaran sont également lourdement impliqués, en collaboration avec les alliés du Hezbollah de Téhéran et d'autres combattants chiites, pour soutenir le régime d'Assad dans la guerre civile syrienne, où parmi les combattants il y a des nationalistes sunnites, des kurdes, des salafistes et des djihadistes affiliés à al-Qaïda.
Le groupe d'opposition iranien en exile du Conseil National de la Résistance iranienne (CNRI) a qualifié la revendication de Zarif selon laquelle les pasdaran combattent le terrorisme de « ridicule »
 « Les pasdaran sont la plus puissante organisation de sécurité militaire qui réprime les opposants en interne et exporte le bellicismes dans les pays de la région », a déclaré le groupe lundi. Les pasdaran sont impliquée dans presque toutes les principales industries et entreprises en Iran. »
Le CNRI a ajouté que les essais de missiles de l’Iran, qui ont été largement critiqués, sont également menés par les pasdaran.
Les législateurs américains et d’autres qui font pression pour la désignation des pasdaran en tant qu'organisation terroriste étrangère indiquent une longue histoire d'implication dans la perpétration et le parrainage du terrorisme à l'étranger – en particulier par sa branche d'opérations étrangères, la Force Qods.
Le Département d'État affirme que l'Iran demeure le « premier État parrain du terrorisme ».
Un nouveau vidéoclip, bien que non daté, montre Hassan Abbasi, stratège et théoricien des pasdaran, associé au groupe de réflexion des pasdaran, « Centre d'analyse doctrinale de la sécurité sans frontières », menaçant de déclencher la terreur aux États-Unis.
Abbasi déclare dans l’extrait de très mauvaise qualité, qu'un petit nombre de saoudiens ont été en mesure de mener les attaques du 11 septembre, et s’interroge combien plus une « armée de guérilla » iranienne pourrait faire, sachant qu'un grand nombre d'Iraniens vivent aux Etats-Unis.
« Si seulement 11 personnes [sic] ont perpétré l’attentat du 11 septembre, vous rendez-vous compte ce que nous pouvons faire ? Nous n’avons pas besoin d’armes nucléaires. »
« Vous [les Américains] possédez 6.000 ogives nucléaires dans votre pays, a-t-il ajouté. Ces 6 000 ogives nucléaires sont des cibles de nos plans pour que nos mouvements de guérilla les détruisent là-bas.
« Ce ne sera même pas uniquement un mouvement de guérilla iranien, mais de tous les pays islamiques », a déclaré M. Abbasi. « Vous pouvez expulser tous les musulmans, mais nous impliquons et travaillons aussi sur les mexicains et les argentins. Nous allons mobiliser toute personne ayant des problèmes avec les États-Unis. »
Abbasi a menacé d’orienter les « organisations mondiales de guérilla » à cibler l’armée américaine ainsi que des cibles vulnérables.